Login



Other Articles by Author(s)

Joice G. Philip
Trapti Jain



Author(s) and WSEAS

Joice G. Philip
Trapti Jain


WSEAS Transactions on Power Systems


Print ISSN: 1790-5060
E-ISSN: 2224-350X

Volume 13, 2018

Notice: As of 2014 and for the forthcoming years, the publication frequency/periodicity of WSEAS Journals is adapted to the 'continuously updated' model. What this means is that instead of being separated into issues, new papers will be added on a continuous basis, allowing a more regular flow and shorter publication times. The papers will appear in reverse order, therefore the most recent one will be on top.



An Improved Redundant Observability Model for Optimal Placement of PMUs with Different Channel Capacities

AUTHORS: Joice G. Philip, Trapti Jain

Download as PDF

ABSTRACT: This paper proposes a new optimization model for optimal placement of PMUs having different channel capacities with improved measurement redundancy. The proposed model provides complete system observability during normal operating conditions as well as contingencies like single line outage and PMU outages. It has been tested on different IEEE test systems and a practical 246 bus Indian system using LINDOGLOBAL solver in GAMS software package. The effect of usage of PMUs with varying channels and fixed channels has been studied using channel utilization factor and total installation cost. It has been found that placing PMUs with varying channel capacity requires less number of channels for complete system observability of the system leading to reduction in installation cost. Further, the proposed redundant observability formulation has been compared with the cost minimization model of PMU placement to demonstrate the improved redundancy obtained with equal number of PMUs.

KEYWORDS: Phasor measurement unit, integer programming, channel limits, measurement redundancy, zero injection bus

REFERENCES:

[1] B. Gou, R. G. Kavasseri, Unified pmu placement for observability and bad data detection in state estimation, Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on 29 (6) (2014) 2573–2580.

[2] F. Aminifar, M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, A. Safdarian, A. Davoudi, M. Shahidehpour, Synchrophasor measurement technology in power systems: Panorama and state-of-the-art, Access, IEEE 2 (2014) 1607–1628.

[3] D. Dua, S. Dambhare, R. K. Gajbhiye, S. Soman, Optimal multistage scheduling of PMU placement: An ILP approach, Power Delivery, IEEE Transactions on 23 (4) (2008) 1812–1820.

[4] L. Huang, Y. Sun, J. Xu, W. Gao, J. Zhang, Z. Wu, Optimal PMU placement considering controlled islanding of power system, Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on 29 (2) (2014) 742–755.

[5] C.-S. Liao, T.-J. Hsieh, X.-C. Guo, J.-H. Liu, C.-C. Chu, Hybrid search for the optimal PMU placement problem on a power grid, European Journal of Operational Research 243 (3) (2015) 985–994.

[6] T. Baldwin, L. Mili, M. Boisen Jr, R. Adapa, Power system observability with minimal phasor measurement placement, Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on 8 (2) (1993) 707–715.

[7] H. H. Muller, C. A. Castro, Genetic algorithm-based phasor measure- ¨ ment unit placement method considering observability and security criteria, IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution 10 (1) (2016) 270–280.

[8] J. Peng, Y. Sun, H. Wang, Optimal PMU placement for full network observability using Tabu search algorithm, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 28 (4) (2006) 223–231.

[9] B. Milosevic, M. Begovic, Nondominated sorting genetic algorithm for optimal phasor measurement placement, Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on 18 (1) (2003) 69–75.

[10] M. Hajian, A. M. Ranjbar, T. Amraee, B. Mozafari, Optimal placement of PMUs to maintain network observability using a modified BPSO algorithm, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 33 (1) (2011) 28–34.

[11] S. Chakrabarti, G. K. Venayagamoorthy, E. Kyriakides, PMU placement for power system observability using binary particle swarm optimization, in: Power Engineering Conference, 2008. AUPEC’08. Australasian Universities, IEEE, 2008, pp. 1–5.

[12] M. B. Mohammadi, R.-A. Hooshmand, F. H. Fesharaki, A new approach for optimal placement of pmus and their required communication infrastructure in order to minimize the cost of the wams, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 7 (1) (2016) 84–93.

[13] N. Manousakis, G. Korres, Optimal allocation of pmus in the presence of conventional measurements considering contingencies, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[14] N. H. Abbasy, H. M. Ismail, A unified approach for the optimal PMU location for power system state estimation, Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on 24 (2) (2009) 806–813.

[15] J. Aghaei, A. Baharvandi, A. Rabiee, M.-A. Akbari, Probabilistic pmu placement in electric power networks: an milp-based multiobjective model, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 11 (2) (2015) 332– 341.

[16] G. N. Korres, N. M. Manousakis, T. C. Xygkis, J. Lofberg, Optimal pha- ¨ sor measurement unit placement for numerical observability in the presence of conventional measurements using semi-definite programming, IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution 9 (15) (2015) 2427–2436.

[17] S. Chakrabarti, E. Kyriakides, D. G. Eliades, Placement of synchronized measurements for power system observability, Power Delivery, IEEE Transactions on 24 (1) (2009) 12–19.

[18] N. P. Theodorakatos, N. M. Manousakis, G. N. Korres, A sequential quadratic programming method for contingency-constrained phasor measurement unit placement, International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems 25 (12) (2015) 3185–3211.

[19] M. Esmaili, K. Gharani, H. A. Shayanfar, Redundant observability PMU placement in the presence of flow measurements considering contingencies, Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on 28 (4) (2013) 3765–3773.

[20] A. Enshaee, R. A. Hooshmand, F. H. Fesharaki, A new method for optimal placement of phasor measurement units to maintain full network observability under various contingencies, Electric Power Systems Research 89 (2012) 1–10.

[21] S. Chakrabarti, E. Kyriakides, Optimal placement of phasor measurement units for power system observability, Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on 23 (3) (2008) 1433–1440.

[22] A. Pal, G. A. Sanchez-Ayala, V. A. Centeno, J. S. Thorp, A pmu placement scheme ensuring real-time monitoring of critical buses of the network, Power Delivery, IEEE Transactions on 29 (2) (2014) 510–517.

[23] K. Jamuna, K. Swarup, Multi-objective biogeography based optimization for optimal pmu placement, Applied Soft Computing 12 (5) (2012) 1503– 1510.

[24] M. Dalali, H. K. Karegar, Optimal pmu placement for full observability of the power network with maximum redundancy using modified binary cuckoo optimisation algorithm, IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution 10 (11) (2016) 2817–2824.

[25] M. Korkali, A. Abur, Placement of PMUs with channel limits, in: Power & Energy Society General Meeting, 2009. PES’09. IEEE, IEEE, 2009, pp. 1–4.

[26] V. Rokkamand, R. Bhimasingu, A novel approach for optimal PMU placement considering channel limit, in: Power System Technology (POWERCON), 2014 International Conference on, IEEE, 2014, pp. 1164–1171.

[27] F. Aminifar, A. Khodaei, M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M. Shahidehpour, Contingency-constrained PMU placement in power networks, Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on 25 (1) (2010) 516–523.

[28] M. Korkali, A. Abur, Impact of network sparsity on strategic placement of phasor measurement units with fixed channel capacity, in: Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Symposium on, IEEE, 2010, pp. 3445–3448.

[29] O. Gomez, M. Rios, G. Anders, et al., Reliability-based phasor measurement unit placement in power systems considering transmission line outages and channel limits, Generation, Transmission & Distribution, IET 8 (1) (2014) 121–130.

[30] F. Rashidi, E. Abiri, T. Niknam, M. R. Salehi, Optimal placement of PMUs with limited number of channels for complete topological observability of power systems under various contingencies, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 67 (2015) 125–137.

[31] Z. Miljanic, I. Djurovi ´ c, I. Vujo ´ sevi ˇ c, Optimal placement of PMUs with ´ limited number of channels, Electric Power Systems Research 90 (2012) 93–98.

[32] Z. Zhao, E. B. Makram, Optimal PMU placement considering number of analog channels, in: North American Power Symposium (NAPS), 2011, IEEE, 2011, pp. 1–5.

[33] A. M. Najafabadi, A. T. Alouani, Optimal PMU placement algorithm with minimum measurement channels, 2011.

[34] F. Aminifar, M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, A. Safdarian, M. Shahidehpour, Observability of hybrid ac/dc power systems with variable-cost pmus, Power Delivery, IEEE Transactions on 29 (1) (2014) 345–352.

[35] NRPG Data, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur

[online], http://iitk.ac.in/eeold/facilities/Researchlabs/ PowerSystem/NRPG-DATA.pdf, accessed: 02 Jan 2016.

[36] R. Sodhi, S. Srivastava, S. Singh, Optimal PMU placement to ensure system observability under contingencies, in: Power & Energy Society General Meeting, 2009. PES’09. IEEE, IEEE, 2009, pp. 1–6.

[37] R. Kumar, V. S. Rao, Optimal placement of PMUs with limited number of channels, in: North American Power Symposium (NAPS), 2011, IEEE, 2011, pp. 1–7.

[38] Z. Miljanic, I. Djurovi ´ c, I. Vujo ´ sevi ˇ c, Multiple channel pmu placement ´ considering communication constraints, Energy Systems 4 (2) (2013) 125–135.

WSEAS Transactions on Power Systems, ISSN / E-ISSN: 1790-5060 / 2224-350X, Volume 13, 2018, Art. #37, pp. 377-385


Copyright © 2018 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0

Bulletin Board

Currently:

The editorial board is accepting papers.


WSEAS Main Site