AUTHORS: János Kundrák, Gyula Varga, István Deszpoth

Download as PDF

ABSTRACT: he auxiliary materials for machining facilitate the quality and accuracy of component manufacturing as well as efficient material removal and increasing productivity. However, the auxiliary materials used (coolants and lubricants) burden our environment. In machining of the machine industry, volume of such materials needed to produce one part may not be large, but there are millions of parts, meaning that a detailed analysis is needed to minimize the quantity of the series as a whole. In this paper, a comparative analysis is performed based on coolants and lubricants used in hard machining processes where the cutting data are adjusted to give the same accuracy and quality to the component

KEYWORDS: Environment load, Material Removal Rate, hard turning, combined procedure, periodic surface, random surface

REFERENCES:

[1] M. Mia, M. A. Khan, N. R. Dhar, High-pressure coolant on flank and rake surfaces of tool in turning of Ti-6Al-4V: investigations on surface roughness and tool wear, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 90, 2017, pp. 1825–1834.

[2] F. Pusavec, A. Stoic, and J. Kopac, Sustainable Machining Process - Myth or Reality, Strojarstvo, vol. 52, no. 2, 2010, pp. 197–204.

[3] A. R. Mashhadi, S. Behdad: Ubiquitous Life Cycle Assessment (U-LCA): A Proposed Concept for Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of Industry 4.0, Manuf. Lett., 15, Part B, January 2018, pp. 93-96.

[4] A. B. Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, C. J. Chiappetta Jabbour, C. F. Moacir Godinho Filho: When titans meet – Can industry 4.0 revolutionise the environmentally sustainable manufacturing wave? The role of critical success factors, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 132, July 2018, pp. 18-25.

[5] I. Tanabe: Double-ECO model technologies for an environmentally-friendly manufacturing, Procedia CIRP 48, 2016, pp. 495–501.

[6] M. Trstenjak, P. Cosic: Process planning in Industry 4.0 environment, Procedia Manufacturing 11, 2017, pp. 1744–1750.

[7] E. Benedicto, D. Carou, E. M. Rubio: Technical, Economic and Environmental Review of the Lubrication/Cooling Systems used in Machining Processes, Procedia Engineering 184, 2017, pp. 99–116.

[8] Kline Company, Global lubricant basestocks: market analysis and opportunities (2015 to 2025), 2016 http://www.klinegroup.com/reports/global_lubr icant_basestocks.asp

[9] Grand View Research, Lubricants Market Analysis by Product, Industrial (Process Oils, General Industrial Oils, Metal Working Fluids, Industrial Engine Oils), Automotive (HeavyDuty Engine Oils, Hydraulic & Transmission Fluid, Gear Oil, Passenger Vehicle Engine Oils, 2015, pp. 1–240.

[10] S. Debnath, M. Mohan, and Q. Sok, Environmental friendly cutting fluids and cooling techniques in machining: A review, J Clean Prod, vol. 83, 2014, pp. 33–47.

[11] J. P. Byers, Metalworking Fluids, Taylor & Francis, 2006, pp. 1-450.

[12] S. Hong and M. Broomer, Economical and ecological cryogenic machining of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel, Clean Techn. Environ Policy, vol. 2, no. 3, 2000, pp. 157–166.

[13] M. K. Gupta, P. Sood, V. S. Sharma, Optimization of machining parameters and cutting fluids during nano-fluid based minimum quantity lubrication turning of titanium alloy by using evolutionary techniques, J. Cleaner Prod. 135, 2016, pp. 1276–1288.

[14] I. Dudás, F. Lierath, G. Varga: Environmentally friendly technologies in machine industry: Dry cutting, cutting with minimum volume of coolants and lubricants, Műszaki Kiadó, Budapest, 2010, (in Hungarian).

[15] A. G. Mamalis, J. Kundrak, K. Gyani: On the dry machining of steel surfaces using superhard tools, Int. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Vol.: 19, No.: 3, 2002, pp.157-162.

[16] A. T. Kuzu, A. Bijanzad, M. Bakkal, Experimental investigations of machinability in the turning of compacted graphite iron using minimum quantity lubrication, Mach. Sci. Technol. 19, 2015, pp. 559–576.

[17] M. Al Bashir, M. Mia, N. R. Dhar, Effect of pulse Jet MQL in surface milling of hardened steel, J. Mech Eng. 45, 2016, pp. 67–72.

[18] M. K. Gupta, P. K. Sood, V. S. Sharma, Performance evaluation of cubic boron nitride tool in machining of titanium (grade-II) under minimum quantity lubrication, Indian Journal of Engineering & Material Sciences, Vol. 24, February 2017, pp.: 18-26.

[19] M. Sarıkaya, V. Yılmaz, A. Güllü, Analysis of cutting parameters and cooling/lubrication methods for sustainable machining in turning of Haynes 25 superalloy, J. Cleaner Prod. 133, 2016, pp. 172–181.

[20] N. R. Dhar, M. Kamruzzaman, M. Ahmed, Effect of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) on tool wear and surface roughness in turning AISI-4340 steel, J. Mater. Process Technol., 172, 2006, pp. 299-304.

[21] M. M. A. Khan, M. A. H. Mithu, N. R. Dhar, Effects of minimum quantity lubrication on turning AISI 9310 alloy steel using vegetable oil-based cutting fluid, J. Mater. Process Technol., 209, 2009, pp. 5573-5583.

[22] S. Ghosh, P. V. Rao, Application of sustainable techniques in metal cutting for enhanced machinability: a review, J. Cleaner Prod. 100, 2015, pp. 17–34.

[23] V. S. Sharma, M. Dogra, N. Suri, Cooling techniques for improved productivity in turning, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 49, 2009, pp. 435–453.

[24] M. Sarıkaya, A. Güllü, Multi-response optimization of minimum quantity lubrication parameters using Taguchi-based grey relational analysis in turning of difficult-to- cut alloy Haynes 25, J. Cleaner Prod. 91, 2015, pp. 347–357.