WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development


Print ISSN: 1790-5079
E-ISSN: 2224-3496

Volume 14, 2018

Notice: As of 2014 and for the forthcoming years, the publication frequency/periodicity of WSEAS Journals is adapted to the 'continuously updated' model. What this means is that instead of being separated into issues, new papers will be added on a continuous basis, allowing a more regular flow and shorter publication times. The papers will appear in reverse order, therefore the most recent one will be on top.


Volume 14, 2018



Analysis of Hydraulic Risk Territories: Comparison Between LIDAR and Other Different Techniques for 3D Modeling

AUTHORS: Vincenzo Barrile, Giuliana Bilotta, Antonino Fotia

Download as PDF

ABSTRACT: Aim of this paper is investigation of a possible use of the technique of LIDAR topographic survey for updating existing hydraulic models for the calculation of Hydraulic head for risk areas. Specifically, this study intends to assess the benefits to be gained from new methods of LIDAR detection comparing calculations and simulations of updated models with those obtained from existing models, highlighting the critical issues of the use made for hydraulic analysis. We also carried out a comparison on the accuracy obtainable from DEM generated with different methods of acquisition and processing.

KEYWORDS: Lidar Hydraulic models Updating hydraulic models Hydraulic analysis DEM

REFERENCES:

[1] F. Crosilla, D. Visintini, G. Prearo, Filtraggio di dati laser altimetrici con modelli autoregressivi SAR ed algoritmi di ricerca dinamica BFS (BlockForwardSearch) Atti della 7a Conferenza Nazionale ASITA, Verona, 2003, pp885-890.

[2] F. Crosilla, D. Visintini, G. Prearo, B. Fico, Esperienze di filtraggio, classificazione, segmentazione e modellazione di dati spaziali da rilievo laser aereo, Bollettino della SIFET, Vol.1, 2005, pp. 13-51.

[3] M.A. Brovelli, M. Cannata, U.M. Longoni, Estrazione di DTM da scansione laser: il test comparativo ISPRS, Atti della VI Conferenza Nazionale ASITA, Perugia, 2002, pp. 553- 558.

[4] V. Casella, Estrazione del DTM di precisione dell’argine di un fiume: fotogrammetria analitica, fotogrammetria digitale e laser scanning a confronto. Atti della VI WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on ENVIRONMENT and DEVELOPMENT Vincenzo Barrile, Giuliana Bilotta, Antonino Fotia E-ISSN: 2224-3496 51 Volume 14, 2018 Conferenza Nazionale ASITA, Perugia, 2001,pp 193-211.

[5] A. Cook, V. Merwade, Effect of topographic data, geometric configuration and modeling approach on flood inundation mapping,Journal of Hydrology, Vol.377, 2009, pp. 131-142.

[6] J.R. French, Airborne Lidar in support of geomorphological and hydraulic modelling, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, Vol.28, 2004, pp. 321-335.

[7] M.I. Smith, F.F.F. Asal, G. Priestnall, The use of photogrammetry and lidar for landscape roughness estimation in hydrodynamic studies, ISPRS, XXXB part B3, 2004, pp. 714-719.

[8] W.J. Syme, Modelling of bends and hydraulic structures in a two dimensional scheme, Conference on Hydraulics in Civil Engineering, Hobart, 2001.

[9] K. Alphonso, D. Charalampidi, Generation of DEM from LIDAR data, 2009.

[10] utorità di Bacino della Calabria, Piano Stralcio di Bacino per l’Assetto Idrogeologico (PAI), Regione Calabria, 2001.

[11] V. Barrile, D. Lamari, V. Gelsomino, P. Sensini, Modellazione 3d tramite droni per monitoraggi e controlli,Atti del 61° Convegno nazionale SIFET, Lecce, 2016.

[12] V. Barrile, G. Bilotta, A. Nunnari, UAV and Computer Vision, Detection of Infrastructure Losses and 3D Modeling, ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. IV 4/W4, 2017, pp. 135-139.

[13] V. Barrile, V. Gelsomino, D. Lamari, P. Sensini, I Droni e la Computer Vision per la modellazione 3D e individuazione degli ammaloramenti nelle infrastrutture, Atti della XX Conferenza Nazionale ASITA, 2016, pp. 690-697.

[14] V. Barrile, V. Gelsomino, G. Bilotta, UAV and Computer Vision in 3D Modeling of Cultural Heritage in Southern Italy. In: International Conference on Materials, Alloys and Experimental Mechanics, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2017, Vol. 225.

[15]V. Barrile, G. Bilotta, A. Nunnari, 3D Modeling with Photogrammetry by UAVs and Model Quality Verification, ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. IV 4/W4, 2017, pp. 129-134.

[16] V. Barrile, G.M. Meduri, G. Bilotta, Laser scanner technology for complex surveying structures WSEAS Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol.7, 2011, pp. 65-74.

[17] V. Barrile, G.M. Meduri, G. Bilotta, Comparison between Two Methods for Monitoring Deformation with Laser Scanner, WSEAS Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol.10, 2014, pp. 497-503.

[18] V. Barrile, G.M. Meduri, G. Bilotta, Experimentations and Integrated Applications Laser Scanner/GPS for Automated Surveys, WSEAS Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol.10, 2014, pp. 471-480.

[19] US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Modeling System, Hec-HMS User's Manual,2001, http:\www.usace.army.mil, accessed 26 May 2015.

[20] US Army Corps of Engineers, Hec-Ras Hydraulic Reference Manual, 2002,http:\www.usace.army.mil,accessed 26 May 2015.

[21] P. Mazzoli, L. Perini, L. Cassani, O. Zani, P. Rosetti, LIDAR, strumento topografico per l’aggiornamento dei modelli idraulici, Estimo e Territorio, Vol.2, 2007, pp. 27-34.

[22] G. Schumann, P. Matgen, M.E.J. Cutler, A. Black, L. Hoffmann, L. Pfister, Comparison of remotely sensed water stages from LiDAR, topographic contours and SRTM, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing,Vol.63, Issue 3, 2008, pp. 283-296.

WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, ISSN / E-ISSN: 1790-5079 / 2224-3496, Volume 14, 2018, Art. #4, pp. 48-52


Copyright © 2018 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0

Bulletin Board

Currently:

The editorial board is accepting papers.


WSEAS Main Site