d1bb3fb8-b021-4071-ae7f-05a12c1b6d1b20210209100244585wseamdt@crossref.orgMDT DepositWSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS1109-952610.37394/23207http://wseas.org/wseas/cms.action?id=4016211202021120201710.37394/23207.2020.17http://wseas.org/wseas/cms.action?id=23182Methodical Aspects of Evaluation of Financial Architecture of EconomyIrynaHalushchakAccounting and Auditing Department, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, UKRAINEMykhailoKuzhelievDepartment of Finance named after L.L. Taranhul, University of the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine, UKRAINEViktorMelnykFinance Department, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, UKRAINETetianaMyhovychDepartment of Finance, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, UKRAINEMaksymZhytarDepartment of Finance named after L.L. Taranhul, University of the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine, UKRAINEThe article describes the effectiveness of financial architecture as one of the key aspects of sustainable economic growth and national prosperity, and therefore the methods and models of evaluating financial architecture as an object of study are becoming increasingly relevant. The created methodology is based on the concept of developing an architecture for evaluating financial architecture as the aggregate methods for evaluating the performance of financial systems, whose institutional matrix is financial architecture. The study of methodological aspects of financial architecture valuation substantiates the necessity of applying the concept of financial architecture evaluation, which is based on the basic assumptions for determining: the object of valuation, the typology of financial architecture for the purpose of evaluation, the nature of the indicators used, the interpretation of the results of valuation. The methodological approach to the evaluation of the financial architecture of the national economy is proposed to be based on four main components, such as: financial development, financial institutions, financial markets and financial stability, with an appropriate set of indicators, which will allow to form a comprehensive approach to the evaluation of the national financial architecture have been created.42120204212020260268https://www.wseas.org/multimedia/journals/economics/2020/a545107-971.pdf10.37394/23207.2020.17.27http://www.wseas.org/multimedia/journals/economics/2020/a545107-971.pdfZhuo Zhang, Jia Wang, Financial Model based on Principle Component Analysis and Support Vector Machine International journal of circuits, systems and signal processing (NAUN), 183-190, Volume 13, 2019.Xia Li, Optimization of VRP for Single Distribution Center Based on Improved Saving Method International journal of circuits, systems and signal processing (NAUN), pp.213-221, Volume 13, 2019 The Financial Development Report 2012. Geneva, NY: World Economic Forum.Global Financial Development Report 2017/2018: Bankers without Borders. Shinasi G. Defining Financial Stability. IMF Working Paper, 2004 URL: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2004/wp04187.pdf (Р.8) European Central Bank. Financial Stability Review, 2010. 10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-4-334-340Sosnovska O., Zhytar M. Financial architecture as the base of the financial safety of the enterprise. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 2018. Vol. 4. No 4. P. 334-340. МельникВ.М., БичковаН.В. Фінансоваархітектуранаціональнихкорпораційтаїївпливнаефективністьфінансовоїдіяльності: монографія. Тернопіль: Астон, 2012, 244 с. 10.21511/imfi.16(2).2019.22Kuzheliev M., Rekunenko I., Boldova A., Zhytar M. Modeling of structural and temporal characteristics in the corporate securities market of Ukraine. Investment Management and Financial Innovations. No 2. 2019, 260-269. 10.2307/2297968Arellano M., Bond S. Sometests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58 (2), 277–297.10.1016/s0304-4076(98)00009-8Blundell R., Bond S. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87 (1), 115-143.