AUTHORS: Yuni Erlina, Djoko Koestiono, Nuhfil Hanani, Syafrial
Download as PDF
ABSTRACT: The fact is that today the price of rubber in the international market fluctuates every year. These conditions indicate the magnitude of the risks faced by rubber farmers. This research relates to the symptoms implementation of the Clean Bokar Program, as well as its impact on the household economic behavior of rubber farmers. The purpose of this study is to identify the profile of rubber plantation business in Central Kalimantan, to assess the performance of the farmers as a result of international rubber price fluctuations, and to analyze the policy simulation of bokar (pre-processed rubber) price enhancement at the farm level on the economic performance of rubber farmer households. The samples were determined by using the disproportionate stratified random sampling method. The data was processed with SAS program (Statistical Analysis System). The results show that the plantation sub-sector has a relatively large contribution to the agricultural. This fluctuating international rubber prices have a significant effect on the activity and production decisions of both rubber farmer groups and rubber farmer households. In addition, the obvious effects are the reduction in the type of products produced, in the working time of the head of the households, and in the type of farming input. The 30 percent increase in bokar price policy simulation (at the farm level) has increased the rubber latex productivity by 22,504 percent in which the total bokar production increased by 25,383 percent. This means that a 30 percent increase in bokar price (at the farm level) increase.
KEYWORDS: Rubber Price, Farmer Performance, Households Economy, Production Decision.
REFERENCES:
[1] Badan Litbang Pertanian, 2013. Prospek dan
Arah Pengembangan Agribisnis Karet.
Jakarta.
[2] Badan Pusat Statistik, 2013. Statistik Karet
Indonesia 2012. Katalog BPS: 5503901.
[3] Badan Pusat Statistik, 2014. Kalimantan
Tengah Dalam Angka 2013. Provinsi
Kalimantan Tengah.
[4] Badan Pusat Statistik, 2016. Provinsi
Kalimantan Tengah Dalam Angka 2016.
Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah.
[5] Badan Pusat Statistik, 2016. Kabupaten
Kapuas Dalam Angka 2016. Provinsi
Kalimantan Tengah.
[6] Becker, G.S. 1965. The Economic Approach
to Human Behavior. The University of
Chicago Press. Chicago.
[7] Budiman A., 2000. The Future of Natural
Rubber Production and Quality in
Indonesia. http://digilib.unila.ac.id. diakses
10-11-2014.
[8] Debertin, D. L. 1986. Agriculture
Production Economics. Mac Millan
Publishing Company. New York.
[9] Direktorat Jenderal Perkebunan, 2017. Karet
2015-2017. Statistik Perkebunan Indonesia.
[10] Ditjen Pengolahan dan Pemasaran Hasil
Pertanian, 2011. Pedoman Penerapan Sistem
Jaminan Mutu Bokar. Kementerian
Pertanian. Jakarta.
[11] Effiong J.B., and Effiong G. B., 2014.
Adoption of Improved Rubber Production
Technologies By Farmers In Akwa Ibom
State, Nigeria. Global Journal Of
Agricultural Sciences. ISSN 1596-2903.
Vol.14, 2015:37-44.
[12] Ellis, F., 1989. Peasant Economics, Farm
Households and Agrarian Development.
Cambride University Press. New York.
[13] Erlina Yuni, Syafrial, Koestiono, Hanani,
2018. Behavior of Rubber Farm Households
on the Labor Usage In Central Kalimantan,
Indonesia. Russian Journal of Agricultural
and Socio-Economic Sciences. ISSN 2226-
1184. RJOAS Vol 6(78), pp. 244-249.
[14] Ethridge Don, 1995. Research Methodology
In Applied Economics (And Conducting
Economic Research). Iowa State University
Press. Pp: 101-113
[15] Gardner, B. L., and Gordon C., Rausser,
2001. Handbook of Agricultural Economics.
Elsevier. Amsterdam-London-New YorkOxford-Paris-Shannon-Tokyo.
[16] Gujarati, D., 2012. Dasar-dasar
Ekonometrika. Buku 2. Penerbit Salemba
Empat.
[17] Hendratno, S., 2006. Kompromi Kooperatif
dan Alokasi Sumberdaya Internal
Rumahtangga Petani Karet di Sumatera
Selatan. Disertasi. Sekolah Pascasarjana.
Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor.
[18] Husin Laila, 2012. The Rubber Farm
Household’s Behavior on Economic
Activities to Achieve Family Food Security.
Departement of Agribusiness, Sriwijaya
University, South Sumatera, Indonesia.
Journal Elsevier ICAAA 2012: July 23-24,
2012, Singapore .
[19] Husin L., dan Sari D., 2011. Perilaku
Ekonomi Rumahtangga Petani Karet di
Prabumulih dalam Alokasi Tenaga Kerja,
Produksi dan Konsumsi. Fakultas Pertanian
Universitas Sriwijaya. Sumatera Selatan.
[20] International Rubber Study Group (2007).
The Rubber Industry of Indonesia: Review
and Prospect to 2020. International Rubber
Study Group.
[21] Johnson Glenn L., 1986. Research
Methodology For Economists (Philosophy
and Practice). Macmillan Publishing
Company. New York.
[22] Leki S., 2016. Model Ekonomi
Rumahtangga Pertanian Campuran Untuk
mencapai Ketahanan Pangan (Di Wilayah
Timor Barat Provinsi Nusa Tenggara
Timur). Disertasi Doktor. Program
Pascasarjana Fakultas Pertanian Universitas
Brawijaya, Malang.
[23] Ling Hsu Wan, 1997. Technology
Adoption, Risk, And Intrafamily Time
Allocation : An Application of The
Agricultural Household Model. Thesis.
Doctor of Philosophy. Agricultural
Economics. The Pennsylvania State
University. Departement of Agricultural
Economics and Rural Sociologi.
[24] Makki, M. F., 2014. Perilaku Ekonomi
Rumahtangga Petani Tanaman Padi di
Lahan Rawa Lebak Kabupaten Hulu Sungai
Utara Kalimantan Selatan. Disertasi Doktor.
Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Pertanian
Universitas Brawijaya, Malang.
[25] Maspanger, D., dan Honggokusumo, S.
2004. Dampak Penerapan Produksi Bersih
Industri Crumb Rubber Pada Peningkatan
Pasar Global. Disampaikan pada
Seminar/Temu Usaha Sosialisasi Produksi
Bersih Industri Crumb Rubber. Pekan Baru,
6 Oktober 2004.
[26] Mubyarto dan Dewanta A., 1991. Karet,
Kajian Sosial-Ekonomi. Penerbit Aditya
Media. Yogyakarta.
[27] Nazir, Moh., 2013. Metode Penelitian.
Ghalia Indonesia. Jakarta.
[28] Purwanti Pudji, 2010. Model Ekonomi
Rumah Tangga Nelayan Skala Kecil Dalam
Mencapai Ketahanan Pangan. Universitas
Brawijaya Press. Malang. Indonesia.
[29] Pindyck, R. S. and D. L. Rubinfeld, 1991.
Econometric Models and Economic
Forecasts. Second Edition. McGraw-Hill
Book Co. Singapore.
[30] Setyamidjaja D., 1993. Karet, Budidaya dan
Pengolahan. Penerbit Kanisius. Yogyakarta.
[31] Singh, 1986. The Basic Model: Theory,
Empirical Results and Policy Concluttions;
Agricultural Household Models: Extentions,
Applications and Policy. The John Hopkins
University Press, Baltimore.
[32] Singh, I. L., Squire and J. Strauss, 1986. The
Basic Model: Theory, Empirical Result and
Policy Conclutions. In: Singh, I, L. Strauss
(Eds). Agricultural Household Model:
Extensions, Applications and Policy. The
Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
and London.
[33] Sitepu K. Rasidin., dan Sinaga M. Bonar.,
2006. Aplikasi Model Ekonometrika:
Estimasi, Simulasi dan Peramalan
Menggunakan SAS. Program Studi Ilmu
Ekonomi Pertanian. Sekolah Pascasarjana.
Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor.
[34] Sugiyono, 2015. Metode Penelitian
Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D. Penerbit
Alfabeta. Bandung.
[35] Summer, D. A., 1982. The Off-Farm Labor
Supply of Farmers. American Journal of
Agricultural Economics. Vol. 64, pp. 499-
509.
[36] Utomo, T.P., A.M. Fauzi, T. Tedja, M.
Romli, A. Aman, dan S. Honggokusumo.
2008. Kajian Perbaikan Agroindustri Karet
Remah Menggunakan Interpretative
Structural Modelling. Prosiding Seminar
Nasional Sains dan Teknologi-II 2008.
Bandar Lampung, 17-18 November 2008.
[37] Widarjono Agus., 2007. Ekonometrika:
Teori dan Aplikasi. Penerbit Ekonisia.
Yogyakarta.
WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, ISSN / E-ISSN: 1109-9526 / 2224-2899, Volume 16, 2019, Art. #15, pp. 130-137
Copyright Β© 2018 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0