AUTHORS: Ibnu Khajar, Hersugondo Hersugondo, Udin Udin
Download as PDF
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study is to determine whether there are any differences between the conventional and sharia mutual fund performance and also to investigate the differences between the sharia index (JII) and conventional index (IHSG). The population of this study includes all stock mutual funds that have a cooperation with Indo Premier Securities for a distribution to investors. Based on the purposive sampling method, the sample is 65 consisting of 14 sharia shares fund (SY) and 51 conventional stock fund (SU). The empirical results show that the sharia mutual fund performance is lower compared with a conventional mutual fund. Furthermore, the sharia and conventional stock mutual fund performance are better than the JII and IHSG.
KEYWORDS: sharia mutual fund, conventional mutual fund, sharia index, conventional index
REFERENCES:
[1] Abdullah, F., Hassan, T., & Mohamad, S.
(2007). Investigation of performance of
Malaysian Islamic unit trust funds.
Managerial Finance, 33(2), 142-153
[2] Ashraf, D. (2013). Performance evaluation of
Islamic mutual funds relative to conventional
funds: Empirical evidence from Saudi
Arabia. International Journal of Islamic and
Middle Eastern Finance and Management,
6(2), 105-121.
[3] Boo, Y. L., Ee, M. S., Li, B., & Rashid, M.
(2017). Islamic or conventional mutual
funds: Who has the upper hand? Evidence
from Malaysia. Pacific-Basin Finance
Journal, 42, 183-192.
[4] Elfakhani, S., Hassan, M. K., & Yusuf, S.
(2013). Comparative Performance of Islamic
Versus Secular Mutual Funds. In 12th
Economic Research Forum Conference in
Cairo, Egypt (pp. 19-21).
[5] Fadillah Mansor, M. I. B. (2017). Evidence
of Risk and Return Performance of Islamic
Mutual Funds: The Case of Malaysia.
Advances in Islamic Finance, Marketing, and
Management, 81–101.
[6] Gallefoss, K., Hansen, H. H., Haukaas, E. S.,
& Molnár, P. (2015). What daily data can tell
us about mutual funds : Evidence from
Norway. Journal Of Banking FinaNCE, 55,
117–129.
[7] Hayat, R., & Kraeussl, R. (2011). Risk and
return characteristics of Islamic equity funds.
Emerging Markets Review, 12(2), 189–203.
[8] Indonesia, R. (1995). Republic Of Indonesia
Law No. 8 Year 1995 Regarding Capital
Market.
[9] Indonesia, R. (2015). Regulation Of The
Financial Services Authority Number
19/Pojk.04/2015 About Publishing And The
Requirements Of Sharia-Compliant Mutual
Funds.
[10] Indonesia, R. (2018). Statistics Of Sharia
Capital Market.
[11] Investment, D. (2018). Mawar Mutual Fund,
96.
[12] Irfan, U. S., Junaid, I., & Muhammad Faizan,
M. (2012). Comparative Valuation between
Islamic and Conventional Mutual Fund.
International Research Journal of Finance
and Economics, 96(May), 28–34.
[13] Kraeussl, R., & Hayat, R. (2008). The
performance of Islamic equity funds,
(February 2011). Retrieved from
http://ssrn.com/abstract=1320712
[14] Market, I. C. (2018). IDX Monthly Statistics,
27(2).
[15] Norman, N. bt, Almsafir, M. K., & Smadi, A.
(2013). “Comparative Study of Conventional
and Sharia-based Unit Trusts Funds
Performance of Public Mutul Berhad.”
Australian Journal of Basic and Applied
Science, 7(9), 354–363.
[16] Othman, J., Asutay, M., & Jamilan, N.
(2018). Comparing the determinants of fund
flows in domestically managed Malaysian
Islamic and conventional equity funds.
Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business
Research, 9(3), 401-414.
[17] Rafay, A., Javed, U., & Izhar, M. A. (2017).
Investigating The Performance Of Islamic
Mutual Funds : Evidence From An Emerging
Economy, 7(2), 234–241.
[18] Rao, Z.-R., Tauni, M. Z., Iqbal, A., & Umar,
M. (2017). Emerging market mutual fund
performance: evidence for China. Journal of
Asia Business Studies, 11(2), 167–187.
[19] Thavaramara, M. T. (2010). Progress and
Issues in Capital Markets Integration :
ASEAN Experience, (February).
[20] Yunanto, A., Daryono, Wahyudi, S., Ghozali,
I., & Udin. (2017). The Value Relevance on
Retail Trade Industry: Evidence from
Southeast Asian Countries. International
Journal of Civil Engineering and
Technology, 8(12), 519-526.
WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, ISSN / E-ISSN: 1109-9526 / 2224-2899, Volume 16, 2019, Art. #10, pp. 78-85
Copyright Β© 2018 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0