Login



Other Articles by Authors

Yingtao Shen
Shenyu Li
Jidong Han



Authors and WSEAS

Yingtao Shen
Shenyu Li
Jidong Han


WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics


Print ISSN: 1109-9526
E-ISSN: 2224-2899

Volume 14, 2017

Notice: As of 2014 and for the forthcoming years, the publication frequency/periodicity of WSEAS Journals is adapted to the 'continuously updated' model. What this means is that instead of being separated into issues, new papers will be added on a continuous basis, allowing a more regular flow and shorter publication times. The papers will appear in reverse order, therefore the most recent one will be on top.


Volume 14, 2017


Seller Product Information vs. Electronic Word-of-Mouth: An Empirical Study on Online Buyers’ Preferences

AUTHORS: Yingtao Shen, Shenyu Li, Jidong Han

Download as PDF

ABSTRACT: Online buyers rely heavily on information delivered online to make their purchase decisions. In a typical online marketplace, multiple sellers are often selling items of the same brand. Prospective buyers who are interested in buying one item of a specific brand have access to two typical types of information: (1) product information provided by the sellers; and (2) seller reputation scores provided by other buyers (electronic word-of-mouth or eWOM). Prior studies have shown that involvement can moderate the effects of eWOM on consumer information processing and decision-making process. In this study, we aim to answer two important research questions. First, when product information from sellers and eWOM of the sellers are both presented, which information has the greater impact on online shoppers’ final preferences? Second, how does involvement with a specific product affect the relative importance of these two types of information? We conducted a conjoint experiment to answer these research questions. We used opera ticket as a low-involvement product and used bicycle as a high-involvement product and designed eight hypothetical seller profiles for each of the two products. These eight seller profiles were ranked and rated by the participants based on their preferences. The results show that when a product is perceived as a high-involvement product, seller reputation is more important than the product information offered by the seller and even price. On the other hand, if a product is perceived to be a low-involvement one, product information offered by the seller is more important than the seller’s reputation. Therefore, we conclude that that product involvement moderates the relative impacts of word-of-mouth and product information on consumers’ preferences. For both products, price is the least important factor.

KEYWORDS: word-of-mouth, involvement, conjoint analysis

REFERENCES:

[1] Arshad, A, Zafar, M., Fatima, I, and Khan, S.K., The Impact of Perceived Risk on Online Buying Behavior, International Journal of New Technology and Research, Vol.8, 2015, pp.13- 18.

[2] Baker, A., Donthu, N, and Kumar, V., Investigating How Word-of-Mouth Conversations about Brands Influence Purchase and Retransmission Intentions, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. LIII, 2016, pp.225- 239.

[3] Cheung, C.M., and Thadani, D., The Impact of Electronic Word-of-Mouth Communication: A Literature Analysis and Integrative Model, Decision Support Systems, Vol.54, 2012, pp.461-470.

[4] Chevalier, J., and Mayzlin, D., The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.43, 2006, pp.345-354.

[5] Chompunuch P., and Beise-Zee., R., The Effects of Word-of-Mouth Incentivization on Consumer Brand Attitude', Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 24, No. 7, 2015, pp.720–735.

[6] Day, G.S., Attitude Change, Media and Word of Mouth, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol.11, 1971, pp.31-40.

[7] Engel, J.F., Kegerris, R.J., and Blackwell, R.D., Word of Mouth Communication by the Innovator, Journal of Marketing, Vol.33, 1969, pp.15-19.

[8] Fenech,t., and O’Cass, A., Internet Users’ Adoption of Web Retailing: User and Product Dimensions, Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol.10, 2001,pp.361-381.

[9] Green, P., and Srinivasan, V., Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice, Journal of Marketing, Vol.54, 1990, pp.3-19.

[10] Jacoby, J., and Kaplan, L.B., The Components of Perceived Risk, Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research, Association for Consumer Research, 1972, pp.382-393.

[11] Katz, E., and Lazarsfeld, P. F., Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communication, Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1955.

[12] Korgaonkar, P., and Karson, E., The Influence of Perceived Product Risk on Consumers’ eTailer Shopping Preference, Journal of Bus Psychology, Vol.22, 2007, pp.55-64.

[13] Lee, J., Park, D.H., and Han, I., The Effect of Negative Online Consumer Reviews on Product Attitude: an Information Processing View, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol.7, No.3, 2008, pp.341–352.

[14] Liao, Z., and Cheung, M.T., Internet-Based Eshopping and Consumer Attitudes: an Empirical Study, Information and Management, Vol.38, 2001, pp.299-306.

[15] Liu, Y., Word of Mouth for Movies: Its Dynamics and Impact on Box Office Revenue. Journal of Marketing, Vol.70, 2006, pp.74-89.

[16] Martin, W.C., and Lueg, J. E., Modeling Wordof-Mouth Usage, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 66, 2013, pp.801-808.

[17] Murray, K.B., A Test of Services Marketing Theory: Consumer Information Acquisition Activities, Journal of Marketing, Vol.55, 1991, pp.10-25.

[18] O'Keefe, D. J., Elaboration Likelihood Model, Persuasion: Theory and Research, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990.

[19] Park, J., Lee, D., and Ahn, J., Risk-Focused ECommerce Adoption Model: a Cross-Country Study, Journal of Global Information Management, Vol.7, 2004, pp.6-30.

[20] Park, D., and Lee, J., eWOM Overload and Its Effect on Consumer Behavioral Intention

[21] Depending on Consumer Involvement, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol.7, No.4, 2008, pp.386–398.

[22] Park, D.H., Lee, J., and Han, I., The Effect of On-line Consumer Reviews on Consumer Purchasing Intention: the Moderating Role of Involvement, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol.11, No.4, 2007, pp.125–148.

[23] Pavlou, P. A., Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol.7, 2003, pp.101-134.

[24] Petty, R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T., Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches, Dubuque, IA: W. M. C. Brown, 1981.

[25] Petty, R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T., Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986

[26] Richins, M., and Root-Shaffer, T., The Role of Evolvement and Opinion Leadership in Consumer Word-of-Mouth: an Implicit Model Made Explicit, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol.15, 1988, pp.32-36.

[27] Roselius, T., Consumer Rankings of Risk Reduction Methods, Journal of Marketing, Vol.35, 1971, pp.56-61.

[28] Shen, Y., Li, S., and DeMoss, M., The Effect of Quantitative Electronic Word of Mouth on Consumer Perceived Product of Quality. International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, Vol.5, No.2, 2012, pp.19- 30.

[29] Sher, P., and Lee, S., Consumer Skepticism and Online Reviews: an Elaboration Likelihood Model Perspective, Social Behavior and Personality, Vol.37, No.1, 2009, pp.137–144.

[30] Shih, H.P., An Empirical Study on Predicting User Acceptance of Eshopping on the Web, Information and Management, Vol.41, 2004, pp.351-368.

[31] Solomon, M., Marshall, G., and Stuart, E., Marketing: Real People, Real Choices, 8th ed, Prentice Hall, 2015

WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, ISSN / E-ISSN: 1109-9526 / 2224-2899, Volume 14, 2017, Art. #18, pp. 163-169


Copyright © 2017 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0