Login



Other Articles by Authors

Ilja Neustadt
Peter Zweifel



Authors and WSEAS

Ilja Neustadt
Peter Zweifel


WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics


Print ISSN: 1109-9526
E-ISSN: 2224-2899

Volume 14, 2017

Notice: As of 2014 and for the forthcoming years, the publication frequency/periodicity of WSEAS Journals is adapted to the 'continuously updated' model. What this means is that instead of being separated into issues, new papers will be added on a continuous basis, allowing a more regular flow and shorter publication times. The papers will appear in reverse order, therefore the most recent one will be on top.


Volume 14, 2017


Do Income Status and Mobility Determine Demand for Income Redistribution? Experimental Evidence

AUTHORS: Ilja Neustadt, Peter Zweifel

Download as PDF

ABSTRACT: In this paper, demand for income redistribution is elicited through a discrete choice experiment performed with a representative sample of the Swiss population. Attributes include both the amount of redistribution as a share of GDP and its uses (working poor, the unemployed, old-age pensioners, families with children, people in ill health) as well as the nationality of beneficiaries. The paper investigates economic determinants of citizens’ willingness to pay for redistribution, using static and dynamic measures of well-being. Demand for redistribution is shown to increase rather than decrease with income and other static measures of well-being, contradicting the conventional Meltzer-Richard model. However, the dynamic Prospect of Upward Mobility hypothesis receives limited empirical support.

KEYWORDS: Income redistribution, preferences, willingness to pay, discrete choice experiments, stated choice, economic well-being, social mobility

REFERENCES:

[1] A. Alesina, P. Giuliano, P, Preferences for Redistribution, Ch. 4, in: Handbook of Social Economics, Vol. 1, pp. 93-131, ed. by Benhabib, J., Bisin, A. and Jackson, M., North-Holland, 2011.

[2] S. Akkoyunlu, I. Neustadt , P. Zweifel, Why Does the Amount of Income Redistribution Differ between United States and Europe? The Janus Face of Switzerland, SOI Working Paper No. 0810, University of Zurich, Socioeconomic Institute, 2009.

[3] A. Alesina, E. La Ferrara, Preferences for Redistribution in the Land of Opportunities, Journal of Public Economics 89: 897–931, 2005.

[4] E. Guillaud, Preferences for Redistribution: an Empirical Analysis over 33 countries, Journal of Economic Inequality 11(1): 57-78, 2013.

[5] T. Boeri, A. Boersch-Supan, G. Tabellini, Pension Reforms and the Opinions of European Citizens, The American Economic Review 92(2): 396–401, 2002.

[6] J. Andreoni, J. Miller, Giving According to GARP: An Experimental Test of the Consistency of Preferences for Altruism, Econometrica 70(2): 737– 752, 2002.

[7] A. Kuhn, A., In the Eye of the Beholder: Subjective Inequality Measures and Individuals’Assessment of Market Justice, European Journal of Political Economy 27(4): 625-641, 2011.

[8] P. Zweifel, I. Neustadt, Why Does the Amount of Income Redistribution Differ between Countries? Comparative Evidence from Switzerland and Germany, CESifo DICE Report 11(3): 39–47, 2013.

[9] J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1999.

[10] J. H. Beck, An Experimental Test of Preferences for the Distribution of Income and Individual Risk Aversion, Eastern Economic Journal 20(2): 131–145, 1994.

[11] T. Persson, G. Tabellini, Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy, MIT Press, 2000.

[12] T. Persson, G. Tabellini, The Economic Effects of Constitutions, Munich Lectures in Economics, MIT Press, 2003.

[13] A. Lizzeri, N. Persico, The Provision of Public Goods under Alternative Electoral Incentives, The American Economic Review 91(1): 225–239, 2001.

[14] G. M. Milesi-Ferretti, R. Perotti, M. Rostagno, Electoral Systems and Public Spending, Quarterly Journal of Economics 117: 609–657, 2002.

[15] L. P. Feld, J. A. Fischer, G. Kirchgaessner, The Effect of Direct Democratic Institutions on Income Redistribution: Evidence for Switzerland, Economic Inquiry 48(4), 817-840, 2010.

[16] A. Alesina, G.-M. Angeletos, Fairness and Redistribution, The American Economic Review 95(4): 960–980, 2005.

[17] R. Benabou, J. Tirole, Belief in a Just World and Redistributive Politics, Quarterly Journal of Economics 121(2): 699–746, 2006.

[18] C. Fong, Social Preferences, Self-Interest, and the Demand for Redistribution, Journal of Public Economics 82: 225–246, 2001.

[19] T. Boeri, A. Boersch-Supan, G. Tabellini, K. O. Moene, B. Lockwood, Would You Like to Shrink the Welfare State? A Survey of European Citizens, Economic Policy 16(32): 7–50, 2001.

[20] T. Romer, Individual Welfare, Majory Voting, and the Properties of a Linear Income Tax, Journal of Public Economics 4: 163–185, 1975.

[21] K. W. S. Roberts, Voting over Income Tax Schedules, Journal of Public Economics 8: 329–340, 1977

[22] A. H. Meltzer, S. F. Richard, A Rational Theory of the Size of Government, Journal of Political Economy 89(5): 914–927, 1981.

[23] A. Alesina, D. Rodrik, Distributive Politics and Economic Growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics 109(1): 465–490, 1994.

[24] T. Persson, G. Tabellini, Is Inequality Harmful for Growth?, The American Economic Review 84(2): 600–621, 1994.

[25] B. Milanovic, The Median-Voter Hypothesis, Income Inequality, and Income Redistribution: An Empirical Test with the Required Data, European Journal of Political Economy 16(3): 367–410, 2000.

[26] A. Alesina, E. Glaeser, Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference, Oxford University Press, 2004.

[27] R. Perotti, Growth, Income Distribution and Democracy: What the Data Say, Journal of Economic Growth 1(2): 149–188, 1996.

[28] F. C. Rodriguez, Does Distributional Skewness Lead to Redistribution? Evidence from the United States, Economics and Politics 11(2): 171–199, 1999.

[29] A. de Tocqueville, De la Démocratie en Amérique, Vol. I, Paris, 1835.

[30] T. Piketty, Social Mobility and Redistributive Politics, Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(3): 551–584, 1995.

[31] A. Hirschman, M. Rothschild, The Changing Tolerance of Income Inequality in the Course of Economic Development, Quarterly Journal of Economics 87(4): 544–566, 1973.

[32] R. Benabou, E. Ok, Social Mobility and the Demand for Redistribution: the POUM Hypothesis, Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(2): 447–487, 2001.

[33] M. Ravallion, M. Lokshin, Who Wants to Redistribute? The Tunnel Effect in 1990s Russia, Journal of Public Economics 76: 87–104, 2000.

[34] H. Rainer, T. Siedler, Subjective Income and Employment Expectations and Preferences for Redistribution, Economics Letters 99: 449–453, 2008.

[35] D. Checchi, A. Filippin, An Experimental Study of the POUM Hypothesis, Research on Economic Inequality 11: 115–136, 2004.

[36] P. A. Samuelson, A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer’s Behaviour, Economics 5(17): 61–71? 1938.

[37] K. Lancaster, Consumer Demand: A New Approach, Columbia University Press, 1971.

[38] D. A. Hensher, J. J. Louviere, J. D. Swait, Combining Sources of Preference Data, Journal of Econometrics 89(1–2): 197–221, 1999.

[39] A. Merino-Castello, Eliciting Consumers’ Preferences Using Stated Preference DiscreteChoice Models: Contingent Ranking versus Choice Experiment, University Pompeu Fabra Economics and Business Working Paper No. 705, 2003.

[40] J. J. Louviere, D. A. Hensher, J. D. Swait, Stated Choice Methods - Analysis and Application, Cambridge University Press, 2000.

[41] M. Ryan, A Comparison on Stated Preference Methods for Estimating Monetary Values, Health Economics 13(3): 291–296, 2004.

[42] D. Luce, Individual Choice Behavior, Wiley and Sons, New York, 1959.

[43] C. F. Manski, S. F. Lerman, The Estimation of Choice Probabilities from Choice Based Samples, Econometrica 45(8): 1977–1988, 1977.

[44] D. McFadden, Conditional Logit Analysis of Quantitative Choice Behavior, in: Frontiers of Economics, pp. 105–142. ed. P. Zarembka, Academic Press, New York, 1974.

[45] D. McFadden, Econometric Models of Probabilistic Choice, in: Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, pp. 198–272. ed. by Ch. Manski and D. McFadden, MIT Press, 1981.

[46] D. McFadden, Economic Choices, The American Economic Review 91(3): 351–378, 2001.

[47] M. E. Ben-Akiva, S. R. Lerman, Discrete Choice Analysis, MIT Press, 1985.

[48] H. Telser, Nutzenmessung im Gesundheitswesen, Kovač, Hamburg, 2002.

[49] A. R. Hole, A Comparison of Approaches to Estimating Confidence Intervals for Willingness to Pay Measures, Health Economics 16: 827–840, 2007.

[50] F. Carlsson, P. Martinsson, Design Techniques for Stated Preference Methods in Health Economics, Health Economics 12: 281–294, 2003.

[51] I. Neustadt, P. Zweifel, Income Redistribution: How Should the Pie be Divided?, Working Paper, 2015.

[52] I. Neustadt, Do Religious Beliefs Explain Preferences for Income Redistribution? Experimental Evidence, CESifo Economic Studies 57(4): 623-652, 2011.

WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, ISSN / E-ISSN: 1109-9526 / 2224-2899, Volume 14, 2017, Art. #10, pp. 87-99


Copyright © 2017 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0