efdaddf1-db53-4021-acd1-6a5c80b946f320210224070831476wseamdt@crossref.orgMDT DepositWSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS2224-28721109-275010.37394/23205http://wseas.org/wseas/cms.action?id=40262720202720201910.37394/23205.2020.19http://wseas.org/wseas/cms.action?id=23186Structure for Synonymous Flow Label (SFL)SumitKushwahaElectronics Engineering Department, Kamla Nehru Institute of Technology, Sultanpur, India.Because of the very high loss rate in general activity, enhancements in connection and transmission innovations have made it more difficult to evaluate packet loss utilizing dynamic execution estimation techniques with plotted traffic. That, along with seriously requesting administration level necessities, implies that network administrators currently should have the option to quantify the loss of the actual user data traffic utilizing inactive execution estimation strategies. Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) strategy portrays the prerequisite for presenting stream characters inside the MPLS architecture. This paper depicts a strategy for achieving this by utilizing a method called Synonymous Flow Label (SFL) in which names that imitate the conduct of different labels give the recognizable proof assistance. These identifiers can be utilized to trigger per stream procedure on the packet at the receiving label switching router.22420212242021305309https://www.wseas.org/multimedia/journals/computers/2020/a745105-041.pdf10.37394/23205.2020.19.37https://www.wseas.org/multimedia/journals/computers/2020/a745105-041.pdf10.17487/rfc3032Rosen, E., Tappan, D., Fedorkow, G., Rekhter, Y., Farinacci, D., Li, T., and A. Conta, “MPLS Label Stack Encoding”, RFC 3032, DOI 10.17487/RFC3032, January 2001. 10.17487/rfc5462Andersson, L. and R. Asati, "Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Stack Entry: "EXP" Field Renamed to "Traffic Class" Field", RFC 5462, DOI 10.17487/RFC5462, February 2009. 10.17487/rfc6790Kompella, K., Drake, J., Amante, S., Henderickx, W., and L. Yong, "The Use of Entropy Labels in MPLS Forwarding", RFC 6790, DOI 10.17487/RFC6790, November 2012. Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017. Bryant, S., Swallow, G., and S. Sivabalan, "A Simple Control Protocol for MPLS SFLs", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-bryant-mpls-sflcontrol- 09, December 2020. 10.17487/rfc3985Bryant, S., Ed. and P. Pate, Ed., "Pseudo Wire Emulation Edge-to-Edge (PWE3) Architecture", RFC 3985, DOI 10.17487/RFC3985, March 2005. 10.17487/rfc6374Frost, D. and S. Bryant, "Packet Loss and Delay Measurement for MPLS Networks", RFC 6374, DOI 10.17487/RFC6374, September 2011. 10.17487/rfc7011Claise, B., Ed., Trammell, B., Ed., and P. Aitken, "Specification of the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Protocol for the Exchange of Flow Information", STD 77, RFC 7011, DOI 10.17487/RFC7011, September 2013. Farrell, S. and H. Tschofenig, "Pervasive Monitoring Is an Attack", BCP 188, RFC 7258, DOI 10.17487/RFC7258, May 2014. 10.17487/rfc8321Fioccola, G., Ed., Capello, A., Cociglio, M., Castaldelli, L., Chen, M., Zheng, L., Mirsky, G., and T. Mizrahi, "Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring", RFC 8321, DOI 10.17487/RFC8321, January 2018. 10.17487/rfc8372Bryant, S., Pignataro, C., Chen, M., Li, Z., and G. Mirsky, "MPLS Flow Identification Considerations", RFC 8372, DOI 10.17487/RFC8372, May 2018.