423a291c-a377-4c3d-b06f-500569a9966120210316054705408wseamdt@crossref.orgMDT DepositWSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS1109-275010.37394/23205http://wseas.org/wseas/cms.action?id=40262720202720201910.37394/23205.2020.19http://wseas.org/wseas/cms.action?id=23186Dynamic Analysis of Semi-Circular Dry-Joint Masonry Arches: Small-Scale Experiment and Discrete Element ModelingTolgaAtarDurham School of Architectural Engineering and Construction, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Scott (Omaha) Campus, Omaha, Nebraska, USATheresaMccabeDurham School of Architectural Engineering and Construction, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Scott (Omaha) Campus, Omaha, Nebraska, USAEceErdogmusDurham School of Architectural Engineering and Construction, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Scott (Omaha) Campus, Omaha, Nebraska, USABoraPulatsuDurham School of Architectural Engineering and Construction, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Scott (Omaha) Campus, Omaha, Nebraska, USAThis study presents a numerical investigation of the dynamic behavior of dry-joint unreinforced semi-circular masonry arches using the discrete element method (DEM). Masonry arches are analyzed as a system of rigid blocks, mechanically interacting with each other through relative contact displacements. First, the applied modeling strategy is validated using a small-scale tilting experiment performed on a 3D printed arch model and a custom-made rotatable platform. Then, quasi-static and dynamic analysis analyses are performed on computational models to better understand the seismic capacity of the masonry arches depending on the frequency content of the excitations, thickness-to-radius ratios, scale of the arch, and the contact stiffness values. The results of the analyses reveal the capabilities of the discrete element models on the simulation of masonry arches. Particular findings include these types of arches’ vulnerability to excitations lower than 2 Hz dominant frequency. Furthermore, the impact of scale and slenderness become more pronounced for frequencies greater than 2 Hz. Finally, it is observed that once contact stiffness values are larger than 10 GPa/m, the effect of this parameter is negligible; but it should be carefully selected at lower values.72320207232020137142https://www.wseas.org/multimedia/journals/computers/2020/a385105-1396.pdf10.37394/23205.2020.19.19https://www.wseas.org/multimedia/journals/computers/2020/a385105-1396.pdf. V. Lemos, “Discrete element modeling of the seismic behavior of stone masonry arches,” in Computer methods in structural masonry, 1997, no. September, pp. 220–227. 10.1061/9780784482261.028B. Pulatsu, E. Erdogmus, E. M. Bretas, and P. B. Lourenço, “In-Plane Static Response of Dry-Joint Masonry Arch-Pier Structures,” in AEI 2019, 2019, pp. 240–248. 10.1061/(asce)ae.1943-5568.0000305B. Pulatsu, E. Erdogmus, and E. M. Bretas, “Parametric Study on Masonry Arches Using 2D Discrete-Element Modeling,” J. Archit. Eng., vol. 24, no. 2, p. 04018005, Jun. 2018. 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001762H. Alexakis and N. Makris, “Hinging Mechanisms of Masonry Single-Nave Barrel Vaults Subjected to Lateral and Gravity Loads,” J. Struct. Eng., vol. 143, no. 6, p. 04017026, 2017. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.08.018R. Dimitri, L. De Lorenzis, and G. Zavarise, “Numerical study on the dynamic behavior of masonry columns and arches on buttresses with the discrete element method,” Eng. Struct., vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 3172–3188, 2011. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.01.024V. Sarhosis, D. Baraldi, J. V. Lemos, and G. Milani, “Dynamic behaviour of ancient free-standing multi-drum and monolithic columns subjected to horizontal and vertical excitations,” Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., vol. 120, no. October 2018, pp. 39–57, 2019. 10.1680/jstbu.16.00071B. Pulatsu, V. Sarhosis, E. M. Bretas, N. Nikitas, and P. B. Lourenço, “Nonlinear static behaviour of ancient free-standing stone columns,” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. - Struct. Build., vol. 170, no. 6, pp. 406–418, 2017. 10.1080/15583058.2020.1728593E. Erdogmus, B. Pulatsu, A. Gaggioli, and M. Hoff, “Reverse Engineering a Fully Collapsed Ancient Roman Temple through Geoarchaeology and DEM,” Int. J. Archit. Herit., vol. 00, no. 00, pp. 1–21, Feb. 2020.E. Erdogmus, B. Pulatsu, B. Can, and K. Ozkan, “Analysis of the Last Standing Arch of the Roman Aqueduct at Blaundos,” in 13th North American Masonry Conference, 2019, no. June, pp. 483–493. 10.3166/ejece.12.915-949. V. Lemos, “Block modelling of rock masses. Concepts and application to dam foundations,” Rev. Eur. Génie Civ., vol. 12, no. 7–8, pp. 915–949, Oct. 2008. Itasca Consulting Group Inc., “3DEC Three Dimensional Distinct Element Code.” Minneapolis, 2013. 10.1016/0148-9062(88)92294-2R. Hart, P. A. Cundall, and J. V. Lemos, “Formulation of a three-dimensional distinct element model-Part I. Mechanical calculations for motion and interaction of a system composed of many polyhedral blocks,” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 107–116, Jun. 1988. 10.1016/0148-9062(88)92293-0P. A. Cundall, “Formulation of a three-dimensional distinct element model—Part I. A scheme to detect and represent contacts in a system composed of many polyhedral blocks,” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 107–116, 1988. J. V. Lemos, “Discrete element modeling of masonry structures,” Int. J. Archit. Herit., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 190–213, 2007. 10.12989/eas.2016.11.4.563B. Pulatsu, E. M. Bretas, and P. B. Lourenço, “Discrete element modeling of masonry structures: Validation and application,” Earthquakes Struct., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 563–582, Oct. 2016. 10.1080/15583058.2019.1650135E. Tavafi, A. Mohebkhah, and V. Sarhosis, “Seismic Behavior of the Cube of Zoroaster Tower Using the Discrete Element Method,” Int. J. Archit. Herit., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–16, 2019. 10.1002/1096-9845(200008)29:8<1093::aid-eqe953>3.0.co;2-sI. Psycharis, D. Y. Papastamatiou, and A. P. Alexandris, “Parametric investigation of the stability of classical columns under harmonic and earthquake excitations,” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1093–1109, Aug. 2000. B. Pulatsu, “Simulation of complex 3D behavior of masonry arch systems (Doctoral dissertation),” University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2019. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.08.002P. Block, T. Ciblac, and J. Ochsendorf, “Real-time limit analysis of vaulted masonry buildings,” Comput. Struct., vol. 84, no. 29–30, pp. 1841–1852, 2006. 10.1193/1.2985763M. J. DeJong, L. De Lorenzis, S. Adams, and J. A. Ochsendorf, “Rocking Stability of Masonry Arches in Seismic Regions,” Earthq. Spectra, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 847–865, Nov. 2008.