WSEAS Transactions on Computers


Print ISSN: 1109-2750
E-ISSN: 2224-2872

Volume 18, 2019

Notice: As of 2014 and for the forthcoming years, the publication frequency/periodicity of WSEAS Journals is adapted to the 'continuously updated' model. What this means is that instead of being separated into issues, new papers will be added on a continuous basis, allowing a more regular flow and shorter publication times. The papers will appear in reverse order, therefore the most recent one will be on top.



A Comparison of Traditional Network and Software-defined Network Schemes using Openflow Protocol

AUTHORS: Andres Franco-Almazan, Nicole Fernandez-Soriano, Sergio Vidal-Beltrán

Download as PDF

ABSTRACT: Today, we are witnessing an increase in the number of services and applications demanded by users and it presents a challenge for traditional networks in terms of implementation, costs and operation. Softwaredefined networks emerge as an agile, flexible and programmable architecture, which places it as a solution in the implementation of network applications and services. This paper presents a comparison between the performance of traditional networks and Software-defined networks applying tests to evaluate the parameters defined by the RFC 2544 methodology, in order to obtain a complete characterization of each scheme using a proposed topology applied to each technology, after that we analyze the performance of each one and examining its advantages and disadvantages. Currently, Software-defined networks and virtualization are a subject of many researches, as they are considered essential to counteract the increase in complexity and costs of managing and operating traditional networks.

KEYWORDS: software-defined network, virtualization, OpenFlow, Opendaylight, Mininet

REFERENCES:

[ 1]. International Telecommunication Union, “Setting the scene for 5G: opportunities and challenges”.

[Online] Available: https://www.itu.int/net4/ITUT/registration/Resolver/Index?handle_id=11.1002 /pub/811d7a5f-en

[2] D. King, C. Rotsos, A. Aguado, N. Georgalas and V. Lopez, 'The Software Defined Transport Network: Fundamentals, findings and futures,' 2016 18th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON), Trento, 2016, pp. 1-4.

[Online]. doi: 10.1109/ICTON.2016.7550669

[3] M. S. Olimjonovich, 'Software Defined Networking: Management of network resources and data flow,' 2016 International Conference on Information Science and Communications Technologies (ICISCT), Tashkent, 2016, pp. 1-3.

[Online]. doi: 10.1109/ICISCT.2016.7777384

[4] V. Gupta, K. Kaur and S. Kaur, 'Network programmability using software defined networking' 2016 3rd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom), New Delhi, 2016, pp. 1170-1173.

[5] A. Srikanth, P. Varalakshmi, V. Somasundaram and P. Ravichandiran, 'Congestion Control Mechanism in Software Defined Networking by Traffic Rerouting' 2018 Second International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC), Erode, 2018, pp. 55- 58.

[Online]. doi: 10.1109/ICCMC.2018.8488041

[6] Citrix, “SDN 101: An introduction to software defined Networking”.

[Online] Available: https://www.citrix.com/content/dam/citrix/en_us /documents/oth/sdn-101-an-introduction-tosoftware-defined-networking-en.

[7] VMware, «Virtualization Overview» 2006.

[Online]. Available: https://www.vmware.com/pdf/virtualization.pdf

[8] P. K. D. S. S. J. Haleplidis E, “Software-Defined Networking (SDN): Layers and Architecture Terminology”. Patent RFC 7426, January 2015.

[9] Cisco, «OpenDaylight OpenFlow Manager (OFM) App» CiscoDevNet,

[Online].Available: https://developer.cisco.com/codeexchange/github/ repo/ CiscoDevNet/OpenDaylight-Openflow-App/

[10] The Linux Foundation Project, «Lithium: The new release,» Opendaylight Project, 2015.

[Online]. Available: https://www.opendaylight.org/what-wedo/current-release/lithium.

[11] V. Padma, P. Yogesh, “Proactive Failure Recovery in OpenFlow Based Software Defined Networks “in 3rd International Conference on Signal Processing, Communication and Networking (ICSCN),2015,

[Online]. doi: 10.1109/ICSCN.2015.7219846

[12] Mininet Team, «An Instant Virtual Network on your Laptop (or other PC)»Mininet,2015.

[Online].Available: http://mininet.org/

[13] S. Bradner, J. McQuaid” Benchmarking Methodology for Network Interconnect Devices”. Patent RFC 2544, March 1999

[14] S. Bradner, J. McQuaid,” Benchmarking Terminology for Network Interconnection Devices”. Patent RFC 1242, July 1991.

[15] Cisco, «Understanding Jitter in Packet Voice Networks(Cisco IOS Platforms)»

[Online].Available:https://www.cisco. com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice/voicequality/18902-jitter-packet-voice.html

WSEAS Transactions on Computers, ISSN / E-ISSN: 1109-2750 / 2224-2872, Volume 18, 2019, Art. #27, pp. 210-216


Copyright © 2018 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0

Bulletin Board

Currently:

The editorial board is accepting papers.


WSEAS Main Site