Login



Other Articles by Author(s)

Giang Nguyen Trung
Heejune Ahn



Author(s) and WSEAS

Giang Nguyen Trung
Heejune Ahn


WSEAS Transactions on Computers


Print ISSN: 1109-2750
E-ISSN: 2224-2872

Volume 16, 2017

Notice: As of 2014 and for the forthcoming years, the publication frequency/periodicity of WSEAS Journals is adapted to the 'continuously updated' model. What this means is that instead of being separated into issues, new papers will be added on a continuous basis, allowing a more regular flow and shorter publication times. The papers will appear in reverse order, therefore the most recent one will be on top.



Comparison of Pre and Post-Filtering Algorithms for Conditional Recommendation

AUTHORS: Giang Nguyen Trung, Heejune Ahn

Download as PDF

ABSTRACT: The demand for recommendation systems gets higher and more popular these days. There have been several studies on recommendation systems, but the most recent ones give focus on the product as a whole and do not give much attention to the user's preferences such as price, type, and color. This paper proposes prefiltering methods and compares the benefits and performance between pre- and post-filtering methods. The prefiltering method ignores ratings of items that are not relevant to the user’s preferences, then reduces the size of target data set to process, saving processing time. The experimental result with MovieLens dataset shows that pre-filtering can provide the recommendation with 8.5 times less computations than post-filtering by restricting item set, and shows 2% improvement in F measurement. Moreover, rating estimation performance can vary from 1% improvement in the ML-1M dataset to 1% decrease in the ML-100K dataset in the RMSE

KEYWORDS: Information Retrieval; Conditional Recommendation; Matrix Factorization; Hierarchical System; Recommendation System; Pre-filtering

REFERENCES:

[1] J. Bennett, S. Lanning, The netflix prize, in: Proceedings of KDD cup and workshop, 2007, p. 35.

[2] G. Adomavicius, A. Tuzhilin, Context-aware recommender systems, Recommender systems handbook Springer US (2015) 191-226.

[3] P. Kouki, S. Fakhraei, J. Foulds, M. Eirinaki, L. Getoor, HyPER: A Flexible and Extensible Probabilistic Framework for Hybrid Recommender Systems, in: Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, 2015, pp. 99-106.

[4] J. McAuley, J. Leskovec, Hidden factors and hidden topics: Understanding rating dimensions with review text, in: Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Recommender systems, 2013, pp. 165-172

[5] J. Nguyen, M. Zhu, Content-boosted matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems, Statistical Analysis and Data Mining 6 (4) (2013) 286-301.

[6] G. Adomavicius, A. Tuzhilin, Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 17 (6) (2005) 734–749.

[7] F. Ricci, L. Rokach, B. Shapira, P. B. Kantor , Recommender Systems Handbook, Springer, 2010.

[8] Y. Koren, R. Bell, C. Volinsky, Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems, Computer 42 (8) (2009) 30-37.

[9] G. Adomavicius, R. Sankaranarayanan, S. Sen, A. Tuzhilin, Incorporating contextual information in recommender systems using a multidimensional approach, ACM Transactions on Information Systems 23 (1) (2005) 103-145.

[10] G. Guo, J. Zhang, Z. Sun, N. Yorke-Smith, LibRec: A Java Library for Recommender Systems, in: Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on User Modelling, Adaptation and Personalization,

WSEAS Transactions on Computers, ISSN / E-ISSN: 1109-2750 / 2224-2872, Volume 16, 2017, Art. #36, pp. 314-319


Copyright © 2017 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0

Bulletin Board

Currently:

The editorial board is accepting papers.


WSEAS Main Site